Skip to main content

German Generals Erich Ludendorff, Paul von Hindenburg and Erich von Falkenhayn during the First World War.

 German Generals Erich Ludendorff, Paul von Hindenburg and Erich von Falkenhayn during the First World War.





Today 107 years ago, on August 29, 1916, German Chief-of-Staff Erich von Falkenhayn was dismissed from his command and replaced by Generals Paul von Hindenburg and Erich Ludendorff as 'Chief of the German Great General Staff' and 'First Quatermaster-General'. For simplicity sake, I will refer to these titles as Chief-of-Staff from now on.


General Erich von Falkenhayn, already Minister of War, was appointed Chief-of-Staff on September 14, 1914, following his predecessor Generel Helmuth von Moltke's nervous breakdown due to the German defeat in the First Battle of the Marne.


Chief-of-Staff Falkenhayn believed the war would be won on the Western Front and thus prioritized it over the Eastern Front. 


This belief was in direct contrast to General Paul von Hindenburg, German Commander in the East, who firmly believed Russia could be defeated by a single, massive, and decisive offensive on the Eastern Front, which, if pulled off, would undoubtedly tip the war in favor of Germany.


Chief-of-Staff von Falkenhayn dismissed this vision as a pipe dream, commencing a fierce and antagonistic rivalry between von Falkenhayn and von Hindenburg. 


During the winter of 1914/1915, von Hindenburg intensified his efforts of getting his will with von Falkenhayn, appealing to the Kaiser, the Empress and the Crown Prince Wilhelm in order to dismiss von Falkenhayn in favor of himself.


The Kaiser was reluctant of losing von Falkenhayn and compromised by removing von Falkenhayn as Minister of War, though still keeping him as Chief-of-Staff.


General von Hindenburg would somewhat get his will in May 1915, when Germany and Austria-Hungary launched a massive offensive at Gorlice-Tarnów on the Eastern Front. 


Although it didn't knock them out of the war, the Gorlice-Tarnów Offensive forced Russia to withdraw 300 km eastwards, resulting in von Hindenburg becoming an even more popular figure in Germany.


don't forget to leave your thoughts in the comments section below.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A great story about a little bit of 'humanity' during a terrible war.

A great story about a little bit of 'humanity' during a terrible war.                                                                                      In April 1945, 2nd Lt. Peter During was a South African fighter pilot (N.7 Squadron) running missions over Italy when his Spitfire was shot down by German AA fire. He managed to crash land his plane behind enemy lines where he was immediately captured.   Whilst been escorted to a German Lufwaffe Prisoner of War (POW) camp (he was a pilot and thus his interrogation and imprisonment was the responsibility of the German airforce), he opened a conversation with his captors. He was quickly able to establish that they could already see the writing on the wall, that the war was at an end and Germany would lose it. ...

He said the family were "acutely aware" there were "extremists of all sides who are keen to hijack this incident for their own ends".

The family of a man who was kicked in the head by police at Manchester Airport has appealed for "calm in all the communities", an MP has said. Paul Waugh, Rochdale MP, said the "traumatised" family wanted to make it clear they had "no political agenda whatsoever" and did not condone political violence. Anger over the video led to protests outside Rochdale police station on Wednesday and Thursday nights, with another protest also held in Manchester city centre on Thursday. Mr Waugh said the family would not be attending any protests or giving any media interviews as they wanted their privacy protected. "The strong message they wanted to give is that they have no political agenda whatsoever," he told BBC Breakfast. "They wanted me to issue an appeal for calm among all sorts of different communities in Rochdale. "We've had a history of unfortunate division in our town and we do not want to go back to those days." He said the famil...

Can a woman ra*pe a man?

Can a woman ra*pe a man? WHENEVER rape is mentioned, the picture that comes to mind is that of a man having sexual intercourse with a woman without her consent. That is why laws and policies often seek to protect women against men. For example, S. 258 of the Criminal Law of Lagos State 2011 states that any man who has unlawful sexual intercourse with a woman or girl without her consent is guilty of an offence called rape and is liable to imprisonment for life. This section makes it clear that it is only men and not women that can commit “the offence called rape”. On other hand, Section 259 of the same law defines sexual assault by penetration using the words “any person” who penetrates sexually any opening in the body of another person with apart of his body or anything else without consent is guilty of a felony and liable to life imprisonment. This is what the law says. Practically, can a woman physically overpower a man and sexually assault him by penetrating an opening in his bo...